Friday, January 27, 2012

Senate overwhelmingly passes Sunday hunting bill

Thursday - 1/26/2012, 4:43pm ET

    By BOB LEWIS
    AP Political Writer

    RICHMOND, Va. - Hunting on private land on Sundays is one step closer to becoming law with passage of a bill by the Virginia Senate.

    Sen. Ralph Northam's measure advanced to the House of Delegates on a 29-11 vote over the objection of senators who said it would discourage people from other outdoor pursuits on Sundays, the only day when sportsmen aren't firing guns nearby.

    The bill applies only to people who wish to hunt on their own property or the private land of someone else provided they carry with them written permission from its owner.

    Sen. Creigh Deeds, D-Bath County, said his daughters are avid equestrians who love horseback trail rides, but do so only on Sundays when stray bullets aren't a threat. "Bullets don't know where property lines are," said Deeds, whose wooded, mountainous home county is popular with hunters.

    Sen. Richard Stuart, a Republican and an avid hunter from Stafford's sprawling suburbs, said the measure would breed resentment from non-hunters afraid to enjoy the outdoors on Sundays.

    "People tolerate us hunters and they do it because they have Sundays to enjoy their property," Stuart said. "This is going to ruin hunting as we know it."

    Sen. Ralph Smith, R-Roanoke County, was more succinct in his opposition, citing the Fourth Commandment: "Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy."

    The sponsor of a Sunday hunting bill that got incorporated into Northam's, Sen. Frank Wagner, R-Virginia Beach, said the bill gives working people time to hunt on weekends. He said no state bordering Virginia outlaws Sunday hunting.

    Sen. Bill Stanley, R-Franklin County, scoffed at Deeds' fears of non-hunters being shot. Most hunting injuries were to hunters themselves, many of them resulting from deer hunters falling from perches they've made for themselves high in trees. Injuries to others, he said, are rare.

    "I'm not aware of anyone being shot off a horse," he said. "When I think of people getting shot off a horse, I think of old Westerns."

    Another opponent, Senate Democratic Leader Richard L. Saslaw, referred to long-ago blue laws that forbade certain businesses on Sundays. When they were repealed, people predicted dire consequences, but none happened, he said

    Monday, January 23, 2012

    Sunday Hunting Advances

    RICHMOND – A Senate committee has approved compromise legislation to allow Virginians to hunt on Sundays.
    The Senate Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources Committee voted 11-4 to lift the state’s ban on Sunday hunting. The bill recommended by the panel would permit hunting on Sundays only on private land in Virginia.
    The measure now goes to the full Senate for consideration.
    “We’ve designated hunting and fishing as a constitutional freedom in Virginia,” said Sen. Chap Petersen, D-Fairfax, who wrote the “private lands” provision. “How you can restrict hunting one day of the week?”
    The committee Thursday considered four Senate bills regarding Sunday hunting.
    Three of them would have lifted the Sunday hunting ban entirely. They were SB 151 by Sen. Phillip Puckett, D-Tazewell; SB 464 by Sen. Ralph Northam, D-Norfolk; and SB 512 by Sen. Frank Wagner, R-Virginia Beach.
    The other bill – SB 173 by Petersen – limited Sunday hunting to private lands with the property owner’s permission.
    The panel folded all of the bills into SB 464 and then passed the measure with the “private lands” provision.
    The seven Democrats on the committee voted for the bill. Four Republicans voted for the bill, and four voted against it.
    “It is time of the Commonwealth of Virginia to make a decision that the government should not be telling us, as property owners, what we can do on our property, and when we can do it,” Northam said.
    The Senate has scheduled a vote on SB 464 during the coming week.
    Existing state law prohibits hunting on Sundays, declaring it a “rest day for all species of wild bird and wild animal life, except raccoons, which may be hunted until 2:00 a.m. on Sunday mornings.”
    Ten other states outlaw hunting on Sundays. They are Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and West Virginia.
    Four bills before the House of Delegates also would repeal or relax Virginia’s Sunday hunting ban:
    • HB 921, by Del. L. Scott Lingamfelter, R-Woodbridge, would rescind the Sunday hunting ban entirely.
    • HB 989, by Del. Will Morefield, R-North Tazewell, would allow hunting on Sundays between 2 p.m. and sunset.
    • HB 369, by Del. Michael Webert, R-Marshall, would allow Sunday hunting only on private lands.
    • HB 1002, by Del. David Ramadan, R-South Riding, would allow Sunday hunting only on private lands in Fairfax, Fauquier, Loudoun and Prince William counties.
    All four measures have been referred to the House Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources.

    Wednesday, May 11, 2011

    Sunday, January 16, 2011

    Deer Get Revenge With A Pox On 2 Hunters

    A white-tailed deer browses at the edge of a farm field in Brunswick, Maine.
    EnlargeRobert F. Bukaty/AP

    A white-tailed deer browses at the edge of a farm field in Brunswick, Maine.









    A couple of deer hunters, one in Virginia and the other in Connecticut, developed strange sores on their index fingers a few weeks after dressing two white-tailed deer they'd killed.

    The men nicked their fingers while dressing the carcasses. Within a few weeks angry-looking raised lesions appeared at the sites of the cuts. Their fingers were slow to heal, so the men went to their doctors.

    Pretty strange stuff.

    Samples from their fingers were sent independently to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2009 for analysis.

    The culprit? A previously unknown virus had infected the men. The CDC researchers, whose findings appear in the latest New England Journal of Medicine, concluded from DNA analysis that the virus belongs to a big group called parapoxviruses.

    A virus caught from a deer caused this sore on a Virginia deer hunter's finger.
    New England Journal of Medicine

    A virus caught from a deer caused this sore on a Virginia deer hunter's finger.

    Viruses like these infect goats, sheep, cattle and even reindeer. Sometimes the bugs jump to humans, like herders, who have a lot of contact with animals.

    The strain of virus found in the deer didn't seem to cause them any harm. And the men are OK, too. The Virginia hunter's lesion healed in about two months, though he still felt a little pain in the finger the following summer. The paper says the Connecticut man's "symptoms mirrored those" of the Virginia hunter. In an e-mail, the CDC's Dr. Inger Damon, senior author of the paper, confirmed both men "fully recovered" without any lasting problems.

    The scientists say this kind of virus doesn't appear to be a health problem for deer. And neither human case was very serious. Still, these types of viruses can cause trouble for people with weakened immune systems. And the lesions can be mistaken for something worse, like anthrax.

    There will probably be more reports of illnesses like these. There are more than 20 million deer romping around the United States these days, up from just 500,000 in 1900. The scientific paper says there are about 10 million deer hunters in this country.

    As a precaution against parapoxviruses, hunters could wear protective gloves when dressing deer. And doctors, the authors write, should ask patients with strange lesions about their hobbies.

    Wednesday, September 22, 2010

    Chronic Wasting Desease

    What is being done about CWD in Virginia?
    VDGIF has developed a CWD Response Plan (PDF)s that guides response actions when CWD is found in or near Virginia, as well as an annually-updated CWD Surveillance Plan (PDF) that guides how we will continue to look for the disease. VDGIF monitors CWD status in other states as well as new information and developments as they emerge, continues to closely regulate captive deer in Virginia, and regularly provides accurate and timely information about CWD to deer hunters and the general public.


    Due to the detection of CWD in Frederick County in 2009, VDGIF has implemented a number of measures to protect Virginia's deer herd, effective April 2010. The following measures will be taken to help slow and contain the spread of CWD. All measures outlined below will apply to the CWD Containment Area located in Frederick County and the City of Winchester west of I-81 and that portion of Shenandoah County west of I-81 and north of Route 675 (see map, right). Hunting season changes and a year-round ban on deer feeding also apply to surrounding areas (including Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah, and Warren counties).

    • All deer killed by hunters within the CWD Containment Area on specified dates must be brought to a designated sampling station for CWD testing:
      The first 3 Saturdays of general firearms season (e.g., November 13, 20, and 27 during 2010)
    • Hunters can still check their deer via telephone or Internet but must bring the deer to a designated CWD sampling station on these specified dates
      For designated sampling stations and other updates, please check this web page and look for press releases before hunting season.
    • Whole deer carcasses or deer parts cannot be transported out of the CWD Containment Area, except:
      Deer parts currently allowed under the carcass importation ban (i.e., quarters or other meat with no spinal material, wrapped boned-out meat; see complete list above)
      Whole deer carcasses or parts being transported directly to commercial meat processors, taxidermists, or lined landfills within Frederick or Shenandoah counties
    • Three hunting season changes will apply to private lands in Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah, and Warren counties and the City of Winchester including:
    • The daily bag limit shall be two deer per day
    • Earn-A-Buck is in effect, meaning at least one antlerless deer must be taken on private lands before the second antlered deer of the license year may be taken on private lands
    • Both the early and late muzzleloading seasons on private lands in Shenandoah County will be full season either sex
    • No changes have been made for public lands in any of these counties
    • Feeding of deer is prohibited year round in Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah, and Warren counties and the City of Winchester. Elsewhere in Virginia, it is unlawful to distribute food, minerals, carrion or similar substances to feed or attract deer from September 1 through the first Saturday in January. This prohibition does not include the planting of wildlife food plots.
    • Rehabilitation is prohibited for any deer that originates from within the CWD Containment Area.

    http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/

    Monday, May 03, 2010

    VDGIF to Hold Public Information Meeting on CWD May 12

    News Release
    For Immediate Release
    4/28/2010
    Contact
    Nelson Lafon, Deer Project Coordinator, 540-248-9295
    Cale Godfrey, Assistant Director of Wildlife Division, 804-367-6482

    VDGIF to Hold Public Information Meeting on CWD
    What does CWD mean to me? Come find out at the CWD Public Information Meeting Scheduled for May 12 at Gainesboro Elementary School

    Richmond, VA — The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) will be hosting an information meeting regarding Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) and how having a confirmed case in Virginia will affect hunting and other activities in the region. The meeting will be held on May 12, at Gainesboro Elementary School from 7-9 p.m. Wildlife biologists and conservation police officers will be on hand to discuss the agency's CWD Response Plan and actions that may be taken.

    VDGIF received laboratory results from CWD samples collected through the 2009-2010 hunting season, and found one confirmed case of CWD. Since 2002, nearly 5,000 samples have been collected in Virginia, and CWD has been detected in only one deer.

    The CWD-positive deer was killed by a hunter on November 14, 2009, in western Frederick County and was one of more than 200 hunter-killed and vehicle-killed deer in the Active Surveillance Area tested this year for CWD. The Active Surveillance Area consisted of parts of western Frederick and Shenandoah Counties. VDGIF biologists have focused CWD surveillance in this area since 2005, when a deer with the disease was found in Hampshire County, West Virginia, within 10 miles of the Virginia state line. Deer with CWD have been found in that area of West Virginia every year since then.

    CWD has been detected in 18 states and two Canadian provinces. CWD is a slow, progressive neurological (brain and nervous system) disease found in deer, elk, and moose in North America. The disease ultimately results in death of the animal. Symptoms exhibited by CWD-infected deer include, staggering, abnormal posture, lowered head, drooling, acting confused, and marked weight loss. There is no evidence that CWD can be naturally transmitted to humans, livestock, or pets.

    Guided by the CWD Response Plan, a CWD Response Team composed of staff from VDGIF and other state and federal agencies considered a range of potential measures to manage CWD in the area. Recommended management actions, endorsed by the Board of Game and Inland Fisheries on April 20, 2010, and effective immediately, include:

    * Delineation of a CWD Containment Area (CA) in western Frederick and Shenandoah counties, including the City of Winchester.
    * Mandatory disease testing of deer harvested by hunters in the Containment Area on November 13, 20, and 27, 2010, at seven designated sampling stations.
    * Prohibition of deer feeding year-round in Clark, Frederick, Shenandoah, and Warren counties, and in the City of Winchester.
    * Prohibit movement of deer carcasses and parts out of the Containment Area, with exceptions for certain parts allowed under the carcass importation law (e.g., quarters), and for parts going to meat processors, taxidermists, or landfills in Frederick or Shenandoah counties.
    * Require meat processors, taxidermists, road-kill pickup crews, and waste management service contractors to dispose of all deer wastes from the Containment Area in a lined landfill in Frederick or Shenandoah counties.
    * Prohibit rehabilitation and release of deer that originate from within the Containment Area and require that deer rehabilitated elsewhere in Frederick or Shenandoah counties not be released outside the county of origin.
    * As a proactive measure to prevent spread of CWD, reduce the deer population in Clark, Frederick, Shenandoah, and Warren counties and in the City of Winchester by increasing the daily bag limit to two deer, activating an Earn-A-Buck requirement, and establishing all muzzleloader seasons as full-season either-sex.

    The full text of recommended management actions can be found on the VDGIF website at www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/diseases/cwd/, along with other information about CWD.

    Anyone who sees a sick deer that displays any of the signs described above should contact the nearest VDGIF office immediately with accurate location information. Please do not attempt to disturb or kill the deer before contacting the VDGIF.

    It is the mission of the VDGIF to maintain optimum populations of all species to serve the needs of the Commonwealth; to provide opportunity for all to enjoy wildlife, inland fish, boating and related outdoor recreation and to work diligently to safeguard the rights of the people to hunt, fish and harvest game as provided for in the Constitution of Virginia; to promote safety for persons and property in connection with boating, hunting and fishing; to provide educational outreach programs and materials that foster an awareness of and appreciation for Virginia's fish and wildlife resources, their habitats, and hunting, fishing, and boating opportunities.

    Tuesday, November 03, 2009

    Strong Leonid Meteor Shower Expected Nov. 17

    Circle Nov. 17 on your calendar, for early that morning a moderate to possibly very strong showing of annual Leonid meteor shower is likely.


    The very strong display will favor those living across most of central and eastern Asia. In this region, meteor rates might briefly rise to a few hundred per hour (the time frame for the most intense activity is anticipated sometime around 21:40 GMT).


    A far more modest, but still potentially enjoyable display of a few dozen Leonid meteors per hour is expected to favor North America. In the United States and Canada, eastern observers will be particularly well-positioned for maximum activity, expected sometime between 3:30 and 5:30 a.m. EST, when the radiant of the Leonid shower will be well up in the dark southeastern sky.


    A meteor shower's radiant is the perspective point from which all the meteors would appear to originate if their paths were traced backward far enough. The higher the radiant is, the more meteors flash into view all over the sky (though meteors can appear anywhere in the sky, so focusing on the radiant is not necessary).


    The Leonid radiant is within the so-called "Sickle" of Leo; a backwards question-mark pattern of stars that outlines the head and mane of the constellation Leo, the Lion. Hence the meteors are known as "Leonids."


    Not in the East? Don't fret. Observers all across North America may experience a good Leonid show with "shooting stars" streaking across the sky every few minutes.


    Also a big plus in 2009 is the lack of any interference from the moon. New moon is on Nov. 16, so skies will be dark for catching the fainter meteor streaks. And the first light of dawn will not break until shortly after 5 a.m. local time.


    Europe and Africa appear largely out of luck. This year's first round of expected enhanced activity will happen chiefly during their daylight hours. The second, stronger outburst will occur during early evening, but that's hours before Leo comes above the horizon. Europeans might try watching before sunrise on the morning of Nov. 17, but are not likely to see more than 10 or 15 Leonids per hour.



    Cosmic garbage


    It may not sound sexy, but simply put, the reason for this year's anticipated good Leonid showing is due to cosmic garbage.


    The Leonids are known to be made up of cosmic litter from a small – 2.2 mi (3.6 km) – dusty comet discovered by two astronomers in the late 19th century and christened Tempel-Tuttle. The Leonid meteors are thought to be the dusty legacy of Comet Tempel-Tuttle because the dust is moving around the sun in virtually the same orbit as the comet.


    As the Earth encounters the debris left behind by the comet's previous passes through our orbit, these tiny fragments of the comet – typically no bigger than a sand grain or the occasional pea – impact our atmosphere at speeds of up to 45 miles per second (71 kps), causing them to blaze briefly but brightly in the night sky.


    The Leonids are not a one-night stand. The dust from Tempel-Tuttle spangles the sky for a few nights every year in mid-November. This year, the peak is expected during the predawn hours of Nov. 17, but early-morning hours on the dates surrounding Nov. 17 could provide a decent show, too.


    Tempel-Tuttle last passed near the sun and Earth more than a decade ago (in 1998) and for several years thereafter the Leonids put on some spectacular displays, producing many hundreds – even thousands of meteors per hour. But with the departed comet now cruising through the outer part of the solar system, we typically would not expect to see more than 8 or 10 Leonids during an hour's watch.


    Yet if several meteor scientists are correct, this year will be atypical. The researchers have produced various models of the Leonid stream and all of them are indicating that the Earth will intersect a few "rivers of rubble" left behind by Comet Tempel-Tuttle.


    Asian forecast


    In particular, French astronomer, Jeremie Vaubaillon, Russian astronomer, Mikhail Maslov and Americans Bill Cooke and Danielle Moser of NASA's Meteoroid Environment Office are all in agreement that material that was ejected from the comet's nucleus during the years 1466 and 1533 will likely produce a very strong meteor display over much of Asia.


    "The year 2009 will not see a Leonid storm, but an outburst for sure," Vaubaillon said, adding that "there are still some uncertainties."

    Last year, the material that was shed by the comet back in 1466 produced about 100 Leonids per hour.
    This year, Earth will cross through the 1466 stream again, but this time much closer – 42,000 mi. (68,000 km) – to the center on Nov. 17 at around 21:40 GMT. This time favors central and eastern Asia (and it comes during daylight in North America). In addition, at about this same time, the Earth will also be passing through dust ejected by the comet in 1533. The consensus forecast among the astronomers for this year suggests anywhere from 130 to perhaps 300 Leonids per hour in Asia, but this spread has been calibrated chiefly using last year's Earth interaction solely with the 1466 stream.

    "But nothing is known (about) the 1533 stream," Vaubaillon said.

    North America forecast

    About 12 to 14 hours before the main event, Earth is forecast to sideswipe a stream of dust that was loosed from the nucleus of Comet Tempel-Tuttle in the year 1567, passing to within 188,000 mi. (302,000 km.) of the stream's center. This interaction could provide smodest activity for North Americans.

    The best guesstimate is for perhaps 25 to 30 Leonids per hour, which would most likely target a time frame sometime between roughly 3:30 and 5:30 a.m. ET (12:30 to 2:30 a.m. PT).

    For North American observers, the emphasis might be on quality, not quantity; for while the numbers might not be exceptionally high as compared to Asia, a few of these meteors, though visible for a just a fraction of a second, might leave bright trails of ionized atoms in their wake that hang in the sky for many seconds – or possibly even minutes – as these tiny dust particles streak through our atmosphere at altitudes of 80 to 100 miles (130 to 160 km).

    And seeing even just one such outstandingly bright meteor like that can make a cold early morning vigil worthwhile.

    Advance practice

    If you want to get started early, you can practice for the big event.

    The first Leonid forerunners might be sighted as early as Nov. 10, although overall activity will be rather low and spotty – perhaps only a few per hour at most. Around Nov. 16, in the predawn, Leonid activity will noticeably increase to perhaps four to eight per hour.

    Observers on the lookout for early Leonids might also notice a number of rather slow moving meteors appearing to emanate from around the constellation of Taurus, the Bull (high in the southwest sky after midnight). These are the Taurid meteors and are most active between Nov. 5 and 12 when they can produce as many as five or 10 per hour.

    Tuesday, September 22, 2009

    Venison vs. Beef, taste test results

    VENISON VERSUS BEEF
    THE TASTE CONTROVERSY ENDS
    FROM THE UNITED STATES VENISON COUNCIL


    Controversy has long raged about the relative quality and taste of
    venison and beef as gourmet foods. Some people say that venison is
    tough, with a strong "wild" taste. Others insist that venison's flavor
    is delicate. An independent food research group was retained by the
    Venison Council to conduct a taste test to determine the truth of these
    conflicting assertions once and for all.

    First, a Grade A Choice Holstein steer was chased into a swamp a mile and
    a half from a road and shot several times. After some of the entrails
    were removed, the carcass was dragged back over rocks and logs, and
    through mud and dust to the road. It was then thrown into the back of a
    pickup truck and driven through rain and snow for 100 miles before being
    hung out in the sun for a day.

    After that it was lugged into a garage, where it was skinned and rolled
    around on the floor for a while. Strict sanitary precautions were
    observed throughout the test, within the limitations of the butchering
    environment. For instance, dogs and cats were allowed to sniff and lick
    the steer
    carcass, but were chased away when they attempted to bite chunks out of
    it.

    Next a sheet of plywood left from last year's butchering was set up in
    the basement on two saw horses. The pieces of dried blood, hair and fat
    left from last year were scraped off with a wire brush last used to
    clean out the grass stuck under the lawn mower.

    The skinned carcass was then dragged down the steps into the basement
    where a half dozen inexperienced but enthusiastic and intoxicated men
    worked on it with meat saws, cleavers and dull knives. The result was
    375 pounds of soup bones, four bushel baskets of meat scraps, and a
    couple of steaks that were an eighth of an inch thick on one edge and an
    inch and a half thick on the other.

    The steaks were seared on a glowing red hot cast iron skillet to lock in
    the flavor. When the smoke cleared, rancid bacon grease was added along
    with three pounds of onions, and the whole conglomeration was fried for
    two hours.

    The meat was gently teased from the frying pan and served to three
    blindfolded taste panel volunteers. Every one of the members of the
    panel thought it was venison. One of the volunteers even said it tasted
    exactly like the venison he had eaten in hunting camps for the past 27
    years. The results of this scientific test show conclusively that there
    is no difference between the taste of beef and venison.

    Friday, January 23, 2009

    Hunter is steamed over decline of deer in national forest

    Doyle Ritchie has been telling anyone who will listen that the number of deer on the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests in Virginia, where he hunts, has experienced a drastic decline.

    “This year the hunting season was just terrible on the national forest,” said Ritchie, a veteran deer hunter of 40 years. He lives in Fulks Run on the edge of the national forest in Rockingham County.

    “I scouted week after week all summer and fall. I hunted day in and day out during the archery, early muzzleloader and firearm’s seasons. I’ve been out during the late archery and muzzleloading season, but with the same results. There are few, if any, deer in the national forest in the many regions I hunted.”

    You might think Ritchie’s message would be a tough sell, considering Department of Game and Inland Fisheries’ officials are saying the 2008-09 deer season could go down as a record when the final count is made in a few weeks. Last season kill was a record.

    Add to that, there are so many deer in some sections of the state that they end up in the grills of vehicles and they account for millions of dollars in crop damage.

    But what Richie says about the national forest gets solid backing from many sportsmen who hunt public property, particularly the northern end of the forest.

    “Hunter after hunter I spoke with reported the same,” he said.

    Even DGIF wildlife biologists share the concern.

    “I agree with him that we have low deer populations on United States Forest Service lands,” said Jay Jeffreys. He is the DGIF regional wildlife manager assigned to the northern Shenandoah Valley, including national forest property.

    Where the differences occur, wildlife officials blame the national forest situation on declining deer habitat, mast failures and lower numbers of hunters. Richie puts the problem squarely on liberal hunting regulations that he says have resulted in a purging of too many does and young bucks.

    “You won’t see mature deer if you shoot out the young ones,” Richie said. “You won’t have deer around here if you take the does.”

    Richie, who calls himself “blunt,” is a newcomer to this debate, which has been going on for about four years and mostly has involved hunters in Rockingham, Augusta and Highland counties. He is more aggressive than most, leveling stinging criticism at Matt Knox, the DGIF deer project coordinator.

    “Knox and his team seem to want to kill off the deer, no matter what,” said Richie. “If it is brown, it needs to go down. You never hear Knox or members of his team say good things about deer. The mentality is pest control.”

    During a recent meeting with Knox, Jeffreys and Bob Ellis, chief of the DGIF wildlife division, Richie recommended a moratorium on shooting does in the national forest and a limit of two bucks that meet a minimum of six points.

    Some restrictions are expected to be set this year, but Richie isn’t likely to get all he wants by a long shot. But officials are sympathetic.

    Here’s the challenge, said Jeffreys: Deer don’t recognize boundaries. They range on both national forest and private land. When they come out of the national forest to forage for food they are confronted by more liberal seasons and bag limits. When they return to the forest there isn’t that much food available.

    “Private land regulations may well have driven down deer numbers on adjoining public land,” he said.

    One resolution would be to enhance deer habitat on the national forest, but state biologists are limited in what they can do.

    “We as an agency can enact regulations but we have real limitations in managing deer habitat on U.S. Forest Service land,” said Jeffreys.

    Just this week, Congress advanced legislation that would set aside 43,000 acres of additional wilderness in Virginia, and environmentalists are betting on the new president to move even further down that road. Wilderness and roadless areas prohibit the kind of forest management that provides the new growth necessary to advance the wellbeing of deer, especially during times of mast failure.

    One factor the two sides agree on, deer are being impacted by the growing number of predators, namely coyotes and black bear.

    “The talk out here where I live is not how many deer that hunters saw, but how many bears they saw,” said Ritchie. “The bear hunters brag about how they have brought the bears back, and they certainly have been successful. But the problem is the number of fawns the bears and coyotes are taking. Last summer, I found so much bear crap in the national forest containing fawn hair that it was hard not to step in it.”

    PART II next week: No easy answer for improving deer herd on the national forest

    Aging of national forest is bad news for deer hunters -- Part 2

    Van Humphreys, who lives in Craig County, can remember hunting in the national forest when you couldn’t see much beyond 50 yards because of the thick understory. It was ideal habitat for deer, not to mention grouse and other wildlife species.

    Now often you can see twice that far because of the scarcity of cover. That’s particularly bad for deer and for deer hunters. The same can be said of grouse and woodcock hunters.

    “No protection, no browse equal no game,” Humphreys said in response to last week’s column on the decline of deer in the national forest.

    The national forest is aging. Browse is giving way to mature trees and a park-like atmosphere.

    “There is a slow but steady decline in quality of deer habitat,” said Jay Jeffreys, a regional wildlife manger for the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.

    While mature trees can produce mast, namely acorns which deer relish, mast crops are unreliable. When they fail, as they did in 2002 and 2003, a mature forest becomes a wasteland. The result: deer productivity and recruitment are impacted, said Jeffreys.

    Whether they realize it or not, hunters are locked in a battle with environmentalists over how the national forest will be managed. Environmentalists want more wilderness and roadless areas, which they are likely to get under the Obama Administration. This means less logging and other minumpliation of the forest, the kind of activities that create quality habitat for deer through new growth.

    There is room for both wilderness and enhanced deer habit on the more than 1 million acres of national forest in Virginia, but that hasn’t kept some environmentalists from trying to hog it all. Either they don’t care or understand what their actions are doing to wildlife.

    Hunters have exerted little effort in fighting back, although they have science on their side. Many simply have switched their attention to private property, where deer are abundant. This lack of hunting pressure adds to the decline in the number of deer being killed on the national forest.

    “Many of our staff believes the reduced number of hunters results in a significant reduction of deer movement, thus fewer deer coming before the hunter’s gun,” said Jeffreys.

    What you have on the national forest is an interaction of a number of factors -- poorer deer habitat, increased predators, fewer hunters, mast failures and more liberal hunting regulations that are designed to address the overabundance of deer on nearby private land but also impact national forest herds.

    Jeffreys correctly places habitat decline at the apex of the equation, but he gets an argument from Doyle Ritchie of Rockingham County who has become a major critic of the DGIF’s deer management practices. Ritchie believes the national forest deer herd has been harmed by DGIF regulations that crop off an excess of does and young bucks.

    While it is true that DGIF has attempted to address the decline in the national forest deer herd by setting more restrictive bag limits on forest property, Ritchie says these efforts have been offset by the addition of an extra week of muzzleloading season and increased youth hunting opportunities.

    “I’m just really angry about the way the national forest is going downhill, yet deer flourish in places right next to the forest,” said Ritchie. “I don’t think it’s a lack of food or mast crop failure. I think the problem is really poor management practices.”

    A case could be made that there are plenty of deer on private land. So why manipulate the national forest for deer? The answers: There are sportsmen who depend on the national forest for their hunting. Other wildlife species, even song birds, benefit from a young forest habitat and the day may come when more hunters will depend on the national forest as private land is developed.

    HERE’S WHAT HUNTERS CAN DO:

    1. Take an active role in the management of the national forest. Right now the George Washington National Forest is revising its Land and Resource Management Plan. The plan is tilting toward removing 42 percent of the forest from active management practices, the kind that provide deer habitat. Several input meetings have been lightly attended by hunters. There are a couple remaining: Jan. 29, 6:30- 9 p.m., Rockbridge County High School, Lexington and Feb. 5, 6:30-9 p.m., Peter Muhlengerg Middle School, Woodstock. Also check the forest’s Web site for information on the plan revision. Let your congressman and senators know that you want deer/grouse habitat to get a fair shake in the management of the national forests.

    2. Participate in the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries’ current regulatory process with an eye toward establishing hunting laws that address the needs of the national forest. Check HuntFishVa.com for opportunities to express views at public meetings and online. Beyond that, tell DGIF and forest officials that you would like for them to rekindle the spirit of the 70-year old Cooperative Wildlife Management Agreement that mandates state wildlife officials working hand-in-hand with federal forest officials.

    Monday, December 22, 2008

    Thursday, December 11, 2008

     


    Christmas may be late this year!
    Posted by Picasa

    Saturday, November 08, 2008

    Bears at the cabin

    Jimmie and Mac related an encounter with aggressive black bears right at the cabin.
    The bear or bears appear to have lost all fear of humans and will stay in the immediate area, even when shouted at.


    Cabins and Residential Areas

    Never leave unattended food or garbage outside.
    Do not feed birds between April and November.
    Do not leave pet food outside (especially overnight).
    Bear-proof bee hives, compost piles, and gardens with electric or chain-link fence.
    Do not leave food as bait for any animals or leave food scraps on the ground.
    If a bear approaches, move your family and any food indoors immediately.

    Bear Encounters

    Although black bears rarely attack, they are powerful animals and are capable of injuring or killing humans. These steps may be helpful if you encounter a bear.

    If you see a bear in the distance, make a wide detour or leave the area.
    Do not feed or toss food to a bear, or any other wild animal.
    Pick up children or put them on your shoulders.
    Never approach bears - they are dangerous wild animals. If a bear changes its natural behavior because of your presence, you are too close.
    Give a bear plenty of room to pass, and it usually will.

    If a bear approaches you:

    Don't run.
    Drop your backpack and then,
    Back away slowly.
    Face the bear, but don't look directly into its eyes.
    Keep it in sight.
    Make yourself look bigger by waving your arms and yelling.
    Make lots of noise and stomp your feet.
    Remember, you can't outrun a black bear. They are extremely fast on the ground or climbing a tree. Warning signs of an attack include: a steady glare; ears laid back; smacking of the jaws and stomping of the front feet.

    If the bear attacks, fight back with anything available. Act aggressively. Throwing rocks or hitting a bear with large sticks has been effective some cases.

    f you're home when a black bear enters your property, there are lots of things you can do to deter it from coming closer or staying. Do not attempt to deter a grizzly (brown) bear on your own - call for help!

    The most important tool we have at our disposal is our own human presence, particularly the use of direct eye contact and a take charge ATTITUDE! First ensure that the bear has a clear and safe avenue of escape with no people or obstacles in its way. Look directly at the bear, facing it and standing tall. Yell at the bear and firmly tell it to leave! "Get out of here, bear!" Keep a can of pepper spray in hand (with the safety removed) in case the bear approaches you too close. Or gather a group of people together - the more people, the more intimidating you will appear to the bear - simply out number it.

    You may use any of the tools noted below in order to appear even more intimidating to the bear.....

    Stones aimed at the bear's rump - never throw stones directly in the bear's face. Stones should not be larger than a golf ball.

    A soup can filled with pebbles and taped shut. Shake it vigorously and then, perhaps throw it beside the bear. These work particularly well in areas where bears may already encounter rattle snakes.

    Big huge beach balls can be tossed at bears often times scaring the heck out of them, opening and closing an umbrella, shaking a big plastic (colored) tarp or a big plastic garbage bag, or banging pots and pans can work as well.

    Varying your technique each time a bear attempts to return works better than always just banging pots and pans or sounding an air horn. Bears catch on quickly if everyone does the same thing, get used to it and soon ignore it.
    Keep a baseball bat handy to beat on trees. If a bear climbs up a tree to escape, yell at them and beat the base of the tree. Keep them up there for a while, smacking the tree and telling them off. It really scares them. After they've been picked on long enough go back inside your home, let them come down and watch them tear off.

    These techniques have been provided courtesy of Ann Bryant of the Lake Tahoe BEAR League.

    I suggest carrying a large caliber pistol (at least .357 class) with you and have your hunting rifle within reach.

    Remember bear season is November 24-January 3.

    The latest Forest Service Proposed Actions

    Laurel Run CE
    - Vegetation management (other than forest products)
    - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants
    Description: Wildlife Openings on approximately 11 acres
    Location: UNIT - Lee Ranger District. STATE - Virginia. COUNTY - Shenandoah. Lee Ranger District; Shenandoah County, Virginia; Great North Mtn.

    In Progress:
    Scoping 02/24/2005 Start 06/2008 Expected:12/2008

    Contact:
    Holden Mason
    540-984-4101
    hmason@fs.fed.us

    Laurel Run/Road Timber Sale EA
    Description: Proposal to harvest about 484 acres in 22 cutting units
    Location: UNIT - Lee Ranger District. STATE - Virginia. COUNTY - Shenandoah. Sideslopes of Great North Mt, Sine Mt, Middle Mt, and Fat Mt.
    Actual: 04/11/2008 Expected Implementation: 05/2009

    Contact:
    Holden Mason
    540-984-4101
    hmason@fs.fed.us

    Outhouse at the cabin




    Thursday I had an outhouse delivered to the cabin from Valley Portable Toilets.
    They already had a unit intalled at the Hotel California's campsite.
    At the spring meeting, it was decided to get a portajohn for the fall hunting season to reduce the waste load on the existing outhouse.
    The cost for a basic unit, serviced weekly, is $78/month.
    We will put a combination lock on the gate to allow them weekly access.

    Monday, July 07, 2008

    Tower Map


    Wind turbines Location Map


    FreedomWorks Shenandoah is 215 MW wind plant proposed on Shenandoah Mountain within George Washington National Forest. FreedomWorks has begun testing permit application process with U.S. Forest Service for MET tower ands special use permits to facilitate avian and bat mist net studies. FreedomWorks Shenandoah will help prepare an environmental impact statement to make sure the project is also is environmentally sound. Testing and study period is expected to last two years after permit issuance.
    (See Vawind.org map, and press articles below).



    Wind turbines to be built in GW Forest

    Wind Turbine Forum
    People in Shenandoah County had the opportunity to hear both sides of the wind turbine debate Tuesday night at a public forum. They turned out to learn more about what potential impacts, good and bad, the turbines would have. Impacts to land, wildlife, and the local economy are just a few of the considerations. ... After about two hours, people left with much to consider. "Both of them brought up good points," says Kelley. "And, it's just something that I think is going to take some time to absorb everything."
    June 19, 2008 by Michael Hyland in WHSV TV3
    People in Shenandoah County had the opportunity to hear both sides of the wind turbine debate Tuesday night at a public forum. They turned out to learn more about what potential impacts, good and bad, the turbines would have.
    Impacts to land, wildlife, and the local economy are just a few of the considerations.
    Douglas Kelley was one of about 250 people looking to understand a plan to put about 130 turbines on the Virginia-West Virginia border in the George Washington National Forest.
    "We've got ourselves dependent on something," says Kelley. "And here's something that may be a solution or may be part of a solution."
    The group, Shenandoah Forum, hosted the event after gaging public interest.
    "We don't know enough to take a position," says Rosemary Wallinger, president of the group. "And tonight was a first step in getting some information."
    Frank Maisano, a representative of the business interested in developing the turbines, FreedomWorks LLC, spoke to the potential economic benefits, including tourism. He says the mammoth structures can be a big draw for curious tourists.
    "We are going to develop projects only where it makes sense," says Maisano. "Hopefully, it will be done in an appropriate manner."
    Environmental specialist Dan Boone doesn't oppose developing wind energy but doesn't think our area is the best spot to pursue it.
    Impacted areas would be on public land near the borders of Rockingham, Shenandoah, and Hardy counties. The turbines would be about 440 feet tall. The U.S. Forest Service and the Federal Aviation Administration are two regulatory agencies that would have to approve any such construction.
    "There [are] many tremendous areas for wind energy development in the Midwest, far greater than the East," says Boone.
    Opponents cite threats to bat and bird populations and say the turbines would only reduce the rate of growth of CO2 emissions, not lower them outright.
    "Our greatest demand for electricity is during the summer, and wind turbines produce their least amount of electricity in the three summer months," says Boone.
    "Unfortunately, those who don't want wind turbines in their own backyard want them in someone else's backyard," says Maisano. "And the fact of the matter is this region needs wind turbines."
    After about two hours, people left with much to consider.
    "Both of them brought up good points," says Kelley. "And, it's just something that I think is going to take some time to absorb everything."
    The U.S. Department of Energy recently released a report detailing how they'd like to achieve the goal of generating 20 percent of our nation's electricity from wind power by 2030.
    JMU will hold a two-day symposium on wind energy starting Wednesday.

    http://www.whsv.com/home/headlines/20205309.html

    Forum on wind turbines

    Forum on wind turbines tonight
    A community forum on the pros and cons of wind turbines along the Virginia-West Virginia border will be held tonight at Peter Muhlenberg Middle School in Woodstock. ...The discussion was triggered in March by a proposal by FreedomWorks LLC, a renewable-energy firm from Harpers Ferry, W.Va., to study the impact of constructing 130 440-foot wind turbines in George Washington National Forest, said Rosemary Wallinger, chairman of the Forum. Freedom Works requested the Federal Aviation Administration look into the plan. The FAA is one of the regulatory bodies involved in wind farm proposals. The proposal also would need the approval of the U.S. Forest Service.
    June 17, 2008 by Anthony Bootz in The Daily News Record
    Shenandoah Group Hosts Woodstock TalkA community forum on the pros and cons of wind turbines along the Virginia-West Virginia border will be held tonight at Peter Muhlenberg Middle School in Woodstock.
    The Shenandoah Forum, a group of central Valley residents working to foster discussion about growth and development in Shenandoah County, is hosting the event, which will run from 7 to 9 p.m.
    The discussion was triggered in March by a proposal by FreedomWorks LLC, a renewable-energy firm from Harpers Ferry, W.Va., to study the impact of constructing 130 440-foot wind turbines in George Washington National Forest, said Rosemary Wallinger, chairman of the Forum.
    Freedom Works requested the Federal Aviation Administration look into the plan. The FAA is one of the regulatory bodies involved in wind farm proposals. The proposal also would need the approval of the U.S. Forest Service.
    Goal An ‘Informed' Public
    The study is the first of many hurdles the company would have to jump to build its turbines on public land in Shenandoah and Rockingham counties. The approval process could take two to three years, according to officials familiar with the plan.
    "Our goal is to provide the community with two things: sources we consider authoritative and accurate, and to provide a format for people to ask questions and get answers so that they can make informed decisions," said Wallinger.
    Tonight's forum will feature a point-counterpoint format with presentations by environmental consultant and policy analyst Dan Boone, as well as Frank Maisono, spokesman for MidWind, an ad-hoc group of mid-Atlantic wind developers. FreedomWorks is a member of MidWind.
    "My role is simply to provide information and alternative analysis," said Boone, formerly with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "It's up to the people to decide whether the pros and cons match up."
    David Carr of the Southern Environmental Law Center also will speak about the legal issues involved in the proposal and the opportunities for public involvement in FreedomWorks' permitting process. Carr will also cover the public's role in the ensuing update of George Washington National Forest's management plan.
    A question-and-answer session will follow the presentations.
    Local Support ‘Essential'
    FreedomWorks declined to speak at the event, said Tim Williamson, managing director for the company, citing the company's intention to provide a series of community meetings following approval of the plan.
    "We understand that gaining local support is essential to the viability of the project," Williamson said.
    The arguments for and against the turbines run the gamut from cleaner, domestic energy, to ecological and aesthetic concerns for local hiking trails and the region's many Civil War battlefields.
    "Our organization is very much in favor of alternative energy ... that includes wind," said Jim Murray, president of the Virginia Wildlife Committee, an organization that has close ties with the Southern Environmental Law Center.
    "However, we think some places are inappropriate, specifically the high ridges of the [forest]."
    Murray cites the danger turbines could have on birds whose principal southern routes run through the Virginia-West Virginia ridgeline. He also expressed concern about the federally protected Cow Knob salamander, which can only be found in the mountain ranges along the Virginias.
    Impact On Battlefields
    The Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation, along with other organizations in the Valley, has offered a contribution to Shenandoah Forum to help cover some of the costs of the event, said Howard Kittel, the foundation's executive director.
    The wind turbines, Kittel said, would damage the "experience" of the three Civil War battlefields the proposed building sites border: Toms Brook, Fishers Hill and New Market.
    "They aren't taking a pro- or anti-position to the issue," Kittel said. "We felt that was an important approach and that it was a great opportunity to quell rumors and get information out there about the proposal."
    The forum has been involved in other hot-button issues in the central Valley. It hosted a January 2005 discussion on the proposed expansion of Interstate 81.

    http://www.dailynews-record.com/opinion_details.php?AID=29236&CHID=1

    Friday, June 20, 2008